MODEL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY LEARNING 5MT (SQRACT) DIMENSIONS BASED PROCESS FOR ENHANCING COGNITIVE ABILITY TO READ THE SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE UNDERSTANDING CLASS X SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Rina Andriani, Yeti Mulyati

Abstract


This study aims to develop and test the effectiveness of the strategy learning model 5MT (mengamati, menanya, membaca, menalar, mengomunikasikan, tes) (SQRACT= survey, question, read, association, communicating, test)) based on the dimension of the cognitive processes to improve reading comprehension of scientific discourse. The study was conducted using the method Reseacrh & Development, includes three phases: the planning, the development, and implementation stages.The implementation results showed among a control group with the experimental group, there is a significant difference of 0.005 <0.05. While learning to read when they see the results of scientific discourse  understanding gained significant difference of 0.009 <0.05 between  who have high scientific attitude and students who have low scientific attitude, and if the relationship between reading comprehension of scientific discourse with a scientific attitude is not there a significant relationship 0.985>0.05. Thus the authors  can improve reading comprehension while enhancing the ability to think of High Order Thinking class X SMAN Ciparay Bandung regency in the academic year 2015/2016

Keywords


Model Development, Strategy 5MT (SQRACT), Cognitive Process Dimension, Ability Reading Comprehension, Scientific Discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Al-Jamal, Dira, Mahir Al-Hawamleh, & Ghadeer Al-Jamal. (2013). An assessment of reading comprehension practice in Jordan. Jordan journal of Educational Scienes. Vol. 9. No. 3, pp-335-344. (pdf) journals.yu.edu.jo/jjes/issues/2013/…/7.pdf.

Anderson, LW. dan Kratwohl, DR. (2010). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan assesmen (Revisi taksonomi pendidikan Bloom). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Edisi Revisi V. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Baldridge, KP. (1979). The seven reading strategies. Connecticut: Baldrige Reading Instruction Materials. Inc.

Carin, A. & Sund, R.B. (1971). Developing questioning techniques. Columbus Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing.

Creswell, JW. (2002) Research design. Jakarta: Klik Press.

Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dahar, R.W. (1992). Dampak pertanyaan dan teknik bertanya guru selama proses belajar mengajar IPA pada berpikir siswa. Bandung: FMIPA IKIP Bandung.

Daryanto. (2014). Pendekatan pembelajaran saintifik kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

De Bono, E. (1990). Mengajar berpikir. Alih Bahasa. Soemardjono. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Umum.

Duke, Nell K. & P. David Pearson. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension.Scholastic RED. Professional Article. From: What Reasearch Has to Say About Reading. Third Edition. Copyright@2002 by the International Reading Association. Inc. www.ps23r.org/download.ayd/file...89d4...

ejournal-undiskha.ac.id/index.php/JJGSD/article/viewfile/859/731—PQRST—8.

Flood, J. (1984) Understanding reading comprehension: cognition, language, and the structure of prose.Delaware 19714. International Reading Association.

Fraenkel dan Wallen. (Fraenkel). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.Amerika. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Harjasujana, A.S. & Damaianti, VS. (2003). Membaca dalam teori dan praktik. Bandung: Mutiara.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

https://ww.google.co.id/?gws_rd=ssi#q=jurnal+tentang+SQ3R (12 Oktober 2015).

https://www.unige.ch/fapse/logopedie/files/2814/1285/1038/cain-article & bis.pdf ESRC, Economic & Social Research Council. Reading Comprehension: Nature, Assesment, and Teaching. (7 Januari 2016)

https://www.questia.com/.../journal/.../a.reading. Reading Comprehension Strategy Using The Discourse of Science.(7 Januari 2016).

Joyce, B & Weil, M. (1980). Models of teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Klein, ML., etc. (1991). Teaching reading in the elementary grades. Annonated instructors edition.United States of america: A Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Kuswana, WS. (2012). Taksonomi kognitif. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30740/jee.v2i1p47-52

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.