Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

  1. Journal of Economic Empowerment Strategy (JEES) aims to disseminate high-quality articles related to economic empowerment strategy. It intends to bring a wide spectrum of researcher, national and local government units, non-governmental organizations, and the related parties to spread their research findings.
  2. Journal of Economic Empowerment Strategy (JEES) intends to discuss and exchange knowledge on economic empowerment strategy and also caters to recent challenges and opportunities for implementing ideas into  economic empowerment strategy.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

All research articles in this journal undergo rigorous double-blind peer review process, based on initial editorial screening and refereeing by at least two anonymous referees. High quality scholarly communication of this nature requires the collaborative efforts of academics. The journal is professionally managed by a team of editors drawn from the academic and practitioner community for a certain fixed period, and a journal administrator.

Journal of Economic Empowerment Strategy (JEES) is calling from to time professionals with sound academic background to serve as: a) language editors to edit manuscripts reviewed and to ensure that these are grammatically correct, consistent in style and readable; b) associate editors, as the need arises, to assist the editorial board in enhancing the technical aspect of the manuscripts.


Qualifications of Reviewers

            The reviewers selected have excellent track records as researchers in the field as evidenced by at least two researches published in refereed journals, two research-related awards, two speakership in related fora, and two experiences in peer review.


Duties of Reviewers

Every article published in Journal of Economic Empowerment Strategy (JEES) is reviewed in advance of publication to evaluate its contribution and ensure technical veracity. Detailed reviews are invaluable for improving overall technical quality, utility, and readability.


Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviewer assists the editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author which will lead to the improvement of the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review a research manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible, he/she should notify the editors-in chief immediately and excuse himself from the review process.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.